On January 29, 2026, a disciplinary announcement from the Chinese Football Association struck the domestic football scene like a thunderbolt. Thirteen professional clubs were handed points deductions and fines. Nine Chinese Super League (CSL) teams will begin the new season with negative points—yet none were relegated. This long-overdue anti-corruption reckoning not only exposed deep-rooted flaws in China’s professional football system, but also raised an uncomfortable question: when traditional giants all stumble, who can still escape the label of a “fake team”?
Shanghai Shenhua and Tianjin Jinmen Tiger stood out as the most severely punished, each docked 10 league points for the 2026 season and fined RMB 1 million. According to the CFA, both clubs were involved in “transactions that violated sporting ethics and undermined fair play” between 2016 and 2018—language closely associated with match-fixing scandals. For Shenhua, a historic powerhouse, the punishment marks a humiliating reset. For Tianjin, whose predecessor Tianjin Teda was a symbol of early professionalism in Chinese football, the penalty represents a long-delayed reckoning.
Even more striking was the collective fall of established powerhouses. Defending champions Shanghai Port were docked five points and fined RMB 400,000, casting a shadow over their recent title. Beijing Guoan, long regarded by supporters as the league’s “cleanest” club, received the same punishment—an outcome that sharply contradicted years of moral self-assurance. The sudden silence among Guoan fans online spoke volumes.
Shandong Taishan were penalized even more heavily, losing six points and paying RMB 800,000 for irregularities spanning 2013 to 2020. As a multiple-time league champion, the length and scale of the violations underlined how deeply entrenched past problems were within the CSL. From 10-point deductions to five- and six-point penalties, the near-universal implication of traditional giants has placed the league’s credibility under intense scrutiny.
Notably, no club was relegated—unlike the 2009 crackdown that saw Guangzhou Pharmaceutical and Chengdu Blades demoted. The CFA explained that penalties were determined based on financial scale, severity, and social impact. Still, critics question whether points deductions and fines alone are sufficient deterrents without the ultimate sanction of relegation.
With 13 clubs punished and 73 football professionals banned for life, the message is clear. Yet when even the self-proclaimed “clean” clubs are tainted, the “fake team” label ceases to be an accusation against individuals—it becomes a collective mark of an era. For fans once eager to defend their clubs while condemning others, the reckoning is sobering.
As the new CSL season begins under unprecedented circumstances, the real test lies ahead. Can penalized giants rebuild with integrity? Can unpunished clubs hold the line? And most importantly, will this moment mark a genuine turning point away from corruption? Only by restoring fair competition at every level can Chinese football finally shed its past—and regain the trust it has lost.
